Ukugxekwa kokuziphatha okuwusizo

Ukugxekwa Kwezimiso Zokuziphatha Ezisebenzayo

Izimiso zokuziphatha ezisebenzisekayo zingenye yezinkolelo-mbono zokuziphatha ezinethonya elikhulu kwifilosofi yokuziphatha yanamuhla. Kalula nje, izimiso zokuziphatha ezisebenzisekayo zihlulela ukulunga noma ukungalungi kwezenzo ngokusekelwe emiphumeleni yazo: isenzo singokokuziphatha uma sikhiqiza okuhle noma injabulo enkulu kubantu abaningi. Lesi simiso sivame ukufingqwa yinkulumo ethi “injabulo enkulu kakhulu kubantu abaningi.” Abantu ababalulekile abanjengoJeremy Bentham noJohn Stuart Mill bathuthukise izimiso zokuziphatha ezisebenzisekayo njengendlela enengqondo yokuhlola inqubomgomo yomphakathi, umthetho, kanye nezinqumo zomuntu ngamunye. Kodwa-ke, naphezu kokuba zisebenza kahle futhi zinobuntu, izimiso zokuziphatha ezisebenzisekayo zibhekene nokugxekwa okukhulu. Lesi sihloko sixoxa ngokugxekwa okuyinhloko kwezimiso zokuziphatha ezisebenzisekayo, ikakhulukazi maqondana namalungelo omuntu ngamunye, ubulungiswa, ukulinganiswa kwenjabulo, kanye nengozi yokuhlukunyezwa emikhubeni yezenhlalo nezepolitiki.

1. Izinkinga Zokuzinikela Komuntu Ngamunye Nokwephulwa Kwamalungelo

Ukugxekwa okwaziwa kakhulu kwe-utilitarianism ukuthi kungathethelela ukuzidela komuntu ngamunye ukuze kuzuze iningi. Uma isilinganiso sokuziphatha siwusizo oluphelele, khona-ke amalungelo noma isithunzi somuntu singanikelwa inqobo nje uma umphumela "uzuzisa kakhulu" kubantu abaningi. Ezimweni ezimbi kakhulu, i-utilitarianism ingabonakala njengokuvumela ukuthethelelwa kwezenzo ezingenabuntu—isibonelo, ukujezisa umuntu ongenacala ukuze kuvinjelwe isiphithiphithi esikhulu, noma ukuphoqa othile ukuba anikele ngesitho ukuze asindise izimpilo zabanye.

Kwabaningi abacabangayo, imicabango yethu yokuziphatha iyawenqaba umqondo wokuthi abantu kufanele baphathwe njengendlela yokufinyelela izinjongo zomphakathi. Lokhu kugxeka kuhambisana nezimiso zokuziphatha ze-deontological (isb., zikaKant), ezigcizelela ukuthi abantu kufanele baphathwe njengezinhloso zabo, hhayi izindlela nje. Utilitarianism, ngesimo sayo esiqinile, ibonakala iyingozi ngoba ayiboni imingcele yokuziphatha okungafanele yephulwe, njengokuvinjelwa kokuhlukumeza noma ukunyundela abantu abangenacala.

2. Ubulungiswa Nokusatshalaliswa Kwezinzuzo

I-Utilitarianism nayo igxekwe ngokunganaki kwayo ubulungiswa bokusabalalisa. Ihlola injabulo ephelele, noma usizo, kodwa ayicabangi njalo ukuthi leyo njabulo isatshalaliswa kanjani. Izinqubomgomo ezimbili ezikhiqiza injabulo ephelele efanayo zibhekwa njengezilingana, yize enye yazo ingadala ukungalingani okukhulu: abantu abambalwa bayazuza kakhulu, kanti abanye bathola okuncane noma bayalimala.

FUNDA  USimone de Beauvoir kanye nobuntu be-feminism

Ngokombono wobulungiswa, ukungalingani akuyona nje indaba "yomona," kodwa kunalokho kuphathelene namathuba okuphila, amalungelo omphakathi, kanye nokuphathwa ngendlela efanele. Abagxeki abanjengoJohn Rawls bayayenqaba i-utilitarianism ngoba bakholelwa ukuthi ayinaki "ukuhlukaniswa kwabantu" - ukuhluka kanye nemikhawulo yokuziphatha yomuntu ngamunye. Ngokwengqondo ye-utilitarian, ukuhlupheka kwengcosana "kungakhanselwa" yinjabulo yeningi, njengokungathi bonke abantu bayinhlangano eyodwa ehlangene. Kodwa-ke, eqinisweni lokuziphatha, ukuhlupheka komuntu oyedwa kuhlala kungokoqobo futhi akulungile ngokuzenzakalelayo ngoba nje abanye bajabule.

3. Ubunzima Bokulinganisa Injabulo Nokuqhathanisa Izinsiza

I-Utilitarianism icabanga ukuthi injabulo, injabulo, noma usizo kungalinganiswa futhi kuqhathaniswe. I-Bentham yaze yakhuluma “nge-hedonic calculus,” njengokungathi singabala ubukhali, ubude, kanye nokuqiniseka kwenjabulo ukuze sinqume inkambo engcono kakhulu yesenzo. Inkinga iwukuthi, okuhlangenwe nakho komuntu kuyinkimbinkimbi. Injabulo ayilinganiswa kalula. Ingabe injabulo yokufunda incwadi ilingana nenjabulo yokudla ukudla okuhle? Ubuhlungu bengqondo kufanele bulinganiswe kanjani uma kuqhathaniswa nobuhlungu bomzimba? Injabulo yesikhashana kufanele ilinganiswe kanjani uma kuqhathaniswa nokwaneliseka kwesikhathi eside?

Ngaphezu kwalokho, ukuqhathanisa usizo phakathi kwabantu kubhekene nenkinga enkulu: asikwazi ngempela ukwazi okuhlangenwe nakho kwangaphakathi kwabanye ngokunembile. Ngisho nalapho kusetshenziswa izinhlolovo zenjabulo, imiphumela ithonywa isiko, indlela abantu ababuza ngayo imibuzo, kanye nokuthambekela kwabantu ekulungiseni izimpendulo zabo. Lapho izilinganiso zingacacile, utilitarianism isengozini yokwehla ibe yizizathu zokwahlulela izinqumo ezisekelwe ekucabangeni noma ezithakazelweni zalabo abasemandleni.

4. Impikiswano Yenjabulo Yekhwalithi vs. Ubuningi

UJohn Stuart Mill wazama ukuthuthukisa i-utilitarianism kaBentham ngokuhlukanisa phakathi kwezimfanelo zenjabulo: kukhona injabulo "ephakeme" (engokwengqondo, yokuziphatha) kanye nenjabulo "ephansi" (engokwenyama, engokwemvelo). Kodwa-ke, lokhu kuthuthukiswa kwaveza ukugxekwa okusha. Nakuba i-utilitarianism ekuqaleni yayihlose ukuba nenhloso futhi ilinganiswe, ukufakwa "kwekhwalithi" kwenza kwaba yinto evamile futhi kube nzima ukuyilinganisa. Ngubani ozonquma ukuthi iyiphi injabulo ephezulu? Ingabe izahlulelo ezinjalo zingabonisa ukucwasa kwesigaba, kwezemfundo, noma kwamasiko?

FUNDA  Imicabango kaGeorge Berkeley mayelana ne-idealism

Abagxeki bathi inguqulo kaMill ye-utilitarianism isengozini yokuba yi-elitist: izinjabulo ezithile zibhekwa njengezibaluleke kakhulu ngoba zifanelana nokunambitheka kwamaqembu athile. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, uma sibuyela enanini elimsulwa, i-utilitarianism ithambekele ekunciphiseni impilo yomuntu ekuqongeleleni izinjabulo, njengokungathi inani lokuphila lingachazwa ngokugcwele yimizwa.

5. Ukungazinaki Izinhloso, Ubuntu, kanye Nobudlelwano Bokuziphatha

Utilitarianism igxila emiphumeleni yezenzo, hhayi ezinhlosweni zomlingisi noma ekuthuthukisweni komlingiswa. Noma kunjalo, emasikweni amaningi okuziphatha, izinhloso kanye nomlingiswa kuyizinto ezibalulekile zokuziphatha. Umuntu osiza abanye ukuze badunyiswe angase athole izinzuzo, kodwa umuzwa wethu usitshela ukuthi kukhona okungafanele ngaleso senzo. Ukuziphatha okuhle kuhlola ukuziphatha ngokuthuthukiswa kwezimpawu ezinhle zomlingiswa njengobulungiswa, isibindi, nokuhlakanipha, hhayi nje umphumela wokugcina.

Ngaphezu kwalokho, i-utilitarianism ivame ukubhekwa njengokungabi nandaba nobudlelwano obukhethekile. Empilweni yangempela, sizizwa sinomuzwa omkhulu wesibopho emndenini, kubangani, noma emiphakathini ethile. I-utilitarianism eqinile ingadinga ukungathathi hlangothi okuphelele: imali ehloselwe ukusiza ingane yakho ingase "inikezwe kangcono" umuntu ongamazi uma inzuzo iyonke inkulu. Lesi sidingo sibhekwa njengesinzima kakhulu futhi esingahambisani nesakhiwo sokuziphatha sabantu abahlala kunethiwekhi yobudlelwano.

6. Utilitarianism kanye Nezidingo Eziphakeme Zokuziphatha

Okunye ukugxekwa ukuthi i-utilitarianism ingaba yinkolelo-mbono edinga okuningi kakhulu. Uma sihlala sinesibopho sokukhulisa injabulo ephelele, khona-ke izenzo eziningi zansuku zonke zingabhekwa njengezingalungile. Isibonelo, ukuthenga izimpahla ezingabalulekile noma ukuya eholidini kungabhekwa njengokungalungile ngoba imali ingasetshenziswa ukusindisa izimpilo ngosizo. Ngokwengqondo ye-utilitarian, izindinganiso zokuziphatha ziba ziphakeme kakhulu futhi zingaholela ekubeni necala elingapheli noma ezidingweni zokuzidela ngokweqile.

FUNDA  Ukuhlaziywa kwefilosofi kaLudwig Wittgenstein

Kwabaningi, inkolelo-mbono yokuziphatha enengqondo kumele ivumele impilo yomuntu siqu, amaphrojekthi omuntu ngamunye, kanye nemingcele yesibopho sokuziphatha. Uma utilitarianism ingazifaki lezi zinto, kuba yinto engenakwenzeka futhi kunzima ukuzisebenzisa.

7. Ingozi Yokuxhashazwa Kwenqubomgomo Yomphakathi

Emkhakheni wenqubomgomo, isimiso "sokuhle okukhulu" sivame ukuzwakala sinengqondo, kodwa singaba ithuluzi elisemthethweni lezenzo zokucindezela. Ohulumeni noma amaqembu anamandla angase athi umhlatshelo weqembu uyadingeka ukuze kube nokuzinza kwezwe, ukukhula komnotho, noma ukuphepha. Lapho "okuhle okukhulu" kuchazwa yilabo abasemandleni, ubuhlakani bungaguqulwa ukuze kuthuliswe ukugxekwa, kuncishiswe amalungelo abantu abambalwa, noma kuthethelelwe ukubhekwa kwabantu abaningi.

Abagxeki baxwayisa ngokuthi izinqubomgomo zokuziphatha zidinga imingcele esekelwe emalungelweni abantu kanye nezimiso zobulungiswa benqubo. Ngaphandle kwalezi ziqondiso, ukubalwa kwezinsizakusebenza kuyingozi yokuthethelela izindlela egameni lemiphumela emihle ebonwayo.

Isiphetho

I-Utilitarianism inikeza indlela elula, esebenzayo, negxile enhlalakahleni yokucabanga ngokuziphatha. Ezimweni eziningi—njengokubeka izinto eziza kuqala empilweni yomphakathi noma ukuhlola izinqubomgomo zomphakathi—indlela yokusebenzisa i-utilitarian iwusizo ekucabangeni ngemiphumela ebanzi. Kodwa-ke, abagxeki abahlukahlukene bakhomba ubuthakathaka bayo obuyisisekelo: i-utilitarianism ingadela amalungelo omuntu ngamunye, inganaki ubulungiswa bokusabalalisa, yenze kube nzima ukulinganisa injabulo, inganaki kakhulu izinhloso kanye nobuntu, futhi ingase ifune imihlatshelo engenangqondo. Ngakho-ke, izazi zefilosofi eziningi ziphikisana ngokuthi i-utilitarianism idinga ukulinganiselwa noma ihlanganiswe neminye imibono efana namalungelo abantu, izimiso zobulungiswa, kanye nokuziphatha okuhle. Ngakho-ke, ukucabangela imiphumela kusabalulekile, kodwa akuyona yodwa ikhampasi yokuziphatha empilweni yabantu eyinkimbinkimbi.

Shiya amazwana